top of page

Dental Practice Case Study: Helping a New Owner Grow an Established Practice

Case study documented by Russ Ledbetter — lead dental practice consultant at The Ledbetter Group.

When a dentist buys an established practice, the opportunity can be exciting and overwhelming at the same time.

​

The patient base is already there. The schedule is already established. The team may already know the patients well. But the new owner also inherits someone else’s systems, habits, policies, staff structure, and production ceiling.

​

That was the situation with this case study.

​

To protect the client’s identity, I will call him Dr. Anderson.

​

Dr. Anderson was a young dentist who had recently bought an older, well-established dental practice in a small-to-medium-sized town of about 21,000 people. He knew he had purchased a good practice. He also knew there was more potential inside the practice than he was currently capturing.

​

The challenge was to grow the practice without disrupting the parts of it that were already working.

​

This was exactly the kind of situation where our consulting work can make a measurable difference.

The Starting Point

At the beginning of the consulting relationship, Dr. Anderson’s practice already had a solid foundation.

​

The practice had approximately 1,600 active patient records and was attracting about 35 new patients per month. Dr. Anderson was averaging $6,036 production per day and working about 15.5 days per month.

​

That placed the practice at approximately:

  • $93,558 per month

  • $1,122,696 per year

 

Those are not weak numbers.

​

This was not a failing practice. It was a good practice with untapped potential.

​

That distinction matters.

​

Many dentists assume consulting is only for practices that are struggling. In reality, some of the best opportunities are found inside already-successful practices that have reached a plateau because their systems have not grown with their potential.

​

Dr. Anderson’s intent was not to start over. His goal was to take control of the practice he had purchased and build the systems needed for the next stage of growth.

The Goals

Dr. Anderson’s goals included:

  1. Increase practice production by a minimum $20,000 per month.  Position doctor to have a 1.5-million-dollar practice.

  2. Reduce stress level through a highly efficient and productive schedule.

  3. Create a motivating bonus system for the staff that is fair to them and to the doctor.

  4. Assist and coach doctor through the process of finding an all-star front desk.

  5. Increase hygiene to 8 days per week.  Implement a recall system to reactivate inactive patients and keep current patients from falling through the cracks.

 

The central goal was simple:

Grow the practice, but do it with structure.

What We Did NOT Change

The practice grew, but NOT because Dr. Anderson worked more days.

​

We did not increase office hours.

​

In our consulting no changes were made to the fee schedule. Our consulting techniques do not include rushing the schedule or making the doctor work harder.

​

And diagnostic standards were not changed. We only focus on management systems.

​

In this case study, the growth came from improving the systems around the doctor: the schedule, the front office, the hygiene department, the recall process, and the way the team was rewarded for growth.

What Changed

1. The practice added an incentive bonus system

One of Dr. Anderson’s goals was to reward the team if the practice became more profitable.

​

That is an important distinction.

​

A bonus system should not simply increase payroll. It should tie the team’s reward to actual practice growth. When designed correctly, a bonus system gives the staff a reason to protect the schedule, support patient flow, improve follow-through, and work together toward the same goals.

​

For Dr. Anderson’s practice, the bonus system helped create alignment.

​

In any practice transition, the staff may still be used to the previous owner’s way of doing things. The new bonus system helped connect the team to Dr. Anderson’s goals and gave them a reason to support the changes instead of simply experiencing them as more demands.

​

The team could see that growth was not just good for the doctor. It was good for them, too.

​

That changed the attitude inside the practice. The staff became more engaged, more motivated, and more connected to the practice’s goals.

​

Next, we had to make sure they had the systems, training, and direction needed to help create that growth.

2. The front desk role was strengthened

The front desk staff person carried over from previous ownership. This person knew the practice, but the new owner felt that she was not right for the position. He wanted to fill the position with a fresh perspective to help drive the next stage of growth.

​

He needed someone energetic, organized, growth-oriented, and open to learning new systems.

​

I coached Dr. Anderson through the hiring process, including how to write a stronger employment ad, how to ask better interview questions, how to use a working interview, and how to check references thoroughly.

​

A strong applicant appeared, but there was one problem.

​

She wanted significantly more money than Dr. Anderson was currently paying for that position.

​

That made him hesitate.

​

I reviewed her background and spoke with her directly. Her dental knowledge, confidence, attitude, and personality stood out. I believed she was worth serious consideration and advised Dr. Anderson to give her a chance. I suggested that he make clear the expectation that she would need to prove she was worth the higher pay.

​

Her response was memorable.

​

She told him, with a smile, “Don’t worry…” — she would be worth every penny.

​

And she was.

​

Patients liked her. She adapted quickly to the new systems. She brought energy to the front office. And the practice began to grow.

​

The previous front desk team member moved into collections, where she performed well, and later retired.

​

This was an important leadership moment for Dr. Anderson. He learned to stop thinking of the front desk role as just another payroll expense and start seeing it as a growth position inside the practice.

3. Hygiene capacity was expanded

When the engagement began, Dr. Anderson had one full-time hygienist and one part-time hygienist working one day per week. From the start he planned to add a hygienist, which he stated in his goals.

​

The practice had enough patient base and new-patient flow to support a larger hygiene department, but that capacity was not yet in place.

​

The intent was to grow hygiene to support recall, reactivation, patient retention, and future production.

​

A new full-time hygienist was added, giving the practice two full-time hygienists, plus one part-time hygiene day.

​

That expansion gave the practice more room to serve existing patients, reactivate inactive patients, and prevent patients from slipping through the cracks.

​

Hygiene growth is not just about adding another column to the schedule. It requires front office follow-through, recall discipline, patient communication, and a clear plan for keeping the added time productive.

4. The schedule and systems were built around growth

The practice did not need random busyness. It needed structure. 

​

We coached the team to understand the practice goals and how the new systems would help achieve those goals. We trained the front desk staff in our scheduling techniques, hygiene recall systems, and managing broken appointments and no-shows.

 

The doctor’s schedule became more productive without becoming more stressful. And the team could see how their daily actions created financial benefits for the practice and for them.

​

That is where consulting work often makes the biggest difference.

​

The opportunity was already inside the practice. The systems had to be strong enough to capture it.

The Results

During the last six months of the consulting year, Dr. Anderson’s practice averaged $8,435 per production day.

​

Based on the same average of 15.5 days per month, that brought the practice to approximately:

  • $130,742 per month

  • $1,568,910 per year

 

Compared to the starting point, the practice increased by:

  • $2,399 per production day

  • $37,184 per month

  • $446,214 per year

 

The practice exceeded the original goal of increasing production by at least $20,000 per month.

​

Just as importantly, the growth did not come at the expense of Dr. Anderson’s quality of life. Stress was not a major problem when the engagement began, and it did not become a problem as the practice grew.

​

The practice became larger, more productive, and more organized.

What Dr. Anderson Said Afterward

At the end of the consulting year, I debriefed Dr. Anderson and asked how he felt about the progress of the practice.

​

Dr. Anderson said:

“I feel great about the progress of the practice. You helped me find the perfect person for the front desk. To be honest, I wouldn’t have hired her because I thought she was asking too much.”

​

He also said:

“We’ve grown more than I thought we could.”

​

The bonus system had changed the way the team approached the practice:

“I love the staff bonus and their new attitudes. They are so much easier to manage and they are working toward the practice’s goals as hard as I am.”

​

And when asked whether he would make the same decision again, he said:

“I would do it again in a heartbeat.”

​

One of his most important comments was not just about production. It was about control:

“I understand the inner workings of my practice, learned things I didn’t even know I needed to know about my business, and I feel in control.”

​

That is often one of the most valuable outcomes of consulting.

​

The numbers matter. But the owner’s understanding of the practice matters, too.

Long-Term Outcome

Years later, Dr. Anderson reported that the practice had continued to grow.

​

The practice eventually expanded to include two associate dentists, six full-time hygienists, and two part-time hygienists. Daily production had grown to more than $24,000.

​

Not every practice will follow the same path, and every practice has its own limits, market, team, and goals.

​

But this case shows what can happen when a dentist buys a good practice and then builds the systems needed to realize its potential.

The Lesson

Being busy is not the same as being productive.

​

Many dentists look at a full schedule and assume there is no more room to grow. But a full schedule can still be inefficient. A practice can be active all day and still leave significant production potential uncaptured.

​

In Dr. Anderson’s case, the opportunity was already there.

​

He had patients. He had new-patient flow. He had a good practice. What he needed was structure.

​

The Ledbetter Group helped him strengthen the front office, expand hygiene, improve recall, align the team through a bonus system, and grow the practice without turning growth into chaos.

​

That is the kind of growth most dentists want.

​

More production. More control. Better systems. A stronger team. And a practice that can grow without becoming harder to manage.

Ready to Find the Untapped Potential in Your Practice?

If your practice is already busy but you suspect it could be producing more, The Ledbetter Group can help you take a closer look.

​

We help dentists identify where production is being lost, where systems are creating stress, and what changes can help the practice grow without raising fees, changing diagnostic standards, or rushing the schedule.

​

Schedule a consultation to talk about what may be possible inside your practice.

Why Dentists Work With The Ledbetter Group

Hands-on consulting for dental practices of many sizes, from solo practices to multi-doctor offices and small DSO groups.

35+ Years of
Dental Consulting
Experience

Scheduling, hygiene, front office, leadership, and accountability systems designed for the realities of a working dental office.

Systems That
Work Inside
Real Practices

The goal is not to make the doctor busier. The goal is to help the practice produce more with better structure and less stress.

Production
Growth With
Less Stress

bottom of page